ISO 28000 2007SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY AUDIT TOOL |
ISO
28000 is an international supply chain
security management
standard.
It explains what organizations need to do to
protect their supply chains.
Use our
ISO 28000 audit tool to comply with the standard and to improve the
overall effectiveness of your
supply chain
security
management system.
Our tool will pinpoint the
security gaps that exist between ISO's security
standard
and your
practices and processes. Once you've filled
all the gaps, you can
be assured
that you've done everything
possible to protect your property, products, and people.
Since our questionnaires
identify the gaps that exist between ISO's standard and
your practices and
processes, they can also be used to perform a gap
analysis.
This page will introduce our
supply chain security audit tool. However, it will not
present the complete
audit program. Instead, it will show you how it is organized
and it will
explain how it works. Once you've examined our audit approach, we hope
you'll consider purchasing our complete
ISO 28000 Supply Chain
Security Audit Tool.
Our ISO
28000 Supply Chain Security Audit Tool
is 71
pages
long and is available
in both pdf and MS doc file formats.
It is easy to understand and ready to use.
|
ISO 28000 2007 SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY AUDIT TOOL TABLE OF CONTENTS (TITLE 81) |
||
|
PART |
INTRODUCTION |
PAGE |
|
1 |
Overview of Supply Chain Security Audit |
3 |
|
2 |
Profile of Supply Chain Security Audit |
7 |
|
3 |
Summary of Supply Chain Security Audit |
8 |
|
4 |
SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY AUDIT QUESTIONNAIRES |
9 |
|
4.1 |
General Supply Chain Security Audit Questionnaire |
9 |
|
4.2 |
Supply Chain Security Policy Audit Questionnaire |
11 |
|
4.3 |
Supply Chain Security Planning Audit Questionnaire |
|
|
4.4 |
Supply Chain Security Implementation Audit Questionnaire |
28 |
|
4.5 |
Supply Chain Security Checking Audit Questionnaire |
45 |
|
4.6 |
Supply Chain Security Review Audit Questionnaire |
61 |
|
5 |
SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY IMPROVEMENT PLANS |
64 |
|
5.1 |
General Supply Chain Security Improvement Plan |
64 |
|
5.2 |
Supply Chain Security Policy Improvement Plan |
65 |
|
5.3 |
Supply Chain Security Planning Improvement Plan |
66 |
|
5.4 |
Supply Chain Security Implementation Improvement Plan |
67 |
|
5.5 |
Supply Chain Security Checking Improvement Plan |
68 |
|
5.6 |
Supply Chain Security Review Improvement Plan |
69 |
|
6 |
LICENSE AGREEMENT AND CONTACT INFORMATION |
70 |
|
NOV 2009 |
COPYRIGHT © 2009 BY PRAXIOM RESEARCH GROUP LIMITED |
VER 1.0 |
|
Security Audit Profile |
|
Before you start your audit, you will be asked to
fill out a one page form |
|
Security Audit Methodology |
|
Our audit tool uses
questions to list the six sets of supply chain 4.1 General Supply Chain
Security Audit Questionnaire Our audit questionnaires
start with Part 4.1 because the For each audit question, two answers are
possible: YES or NO. A YES Once you’ve completed our compliance audit
questionnaires, study In most cases, remedial actions can be formulated
by simply turning |
|
Security Audit Questionnaires |
|
As previously mentioned, the ISO
28000 requirements are presented in In addition, we have used paragraph indents to distinguish between
|
|
Security Audit Scores |
|
Once you’ve answered all the audit questions and
prepared
your
This is how it works. For each section of the audit (4.1 to 4.6), count
|
The following example will
show you what our
ISO 28000 Supply Chain
Security Audit Tool looks like.
|
ISO 28000 2007 SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY AUDIT TOOL PART 4.3 SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY PLANNING AUDIT QUESTIONNAIRE |
|
4.3.1 ANALYZE SECURITY THREATS AND SELECT CONTROLS |
|||||||||
|
IDENTIFY SECURITY THREATS AND ASSESS YOUR RISKS |
|||||||||
|
1 |
Did you define a
methodology to
identify |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
2 |
Did you define the scope of |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
3 |
Did you define the nature of |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
4 |
Can your methodology be used to collect
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
5 |
Can your methodology be used |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
6 |
|
Can your methodology be used |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
7 |
|
Can your methodology be used |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
8 |
|
Can your methodology be used |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
9 |
Can your methodology be used to monitor the |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
10 |
Did you define the timing of |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
11 |
|
Is your methodology future oriented |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
12 |
Did you establish
procedures to
identify |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
13 |
|
Do your risk assessment procedures reflect |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
14 |
|
Do your risk assessment procedures consider
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
15 |
|
Do your risk assessment procedures consider
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
16 |
Do you use your security risk assessment
methods |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
17 |
Do you consider physical failure threats and risks? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
18 |
Do you consider functional failures? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
19 |
|
Do you consider functional failures |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
20 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that functional |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
21 |
Do you consider incidental damage? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
22 |
|
Do you consider incidental damage |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
23 |
Do you consider the likelihood that incidental |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
24 |
Do you consider malicious damage? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
25 |
|
Do you consider malicious damage |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
26 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that malicious |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
27 |
Do you consider terrorist action? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
28 |
|
Do you consider terrorist action |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
29 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that terrorist
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
30 |
Do you consider criminal behavior? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
31 |
|
Do you consider criminal behavior |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
32 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that criminal
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
33 |
Do you consider operational |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
34 |
Do you consider operational threats and |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
35 |
|
Do you consider the failure to control |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
36 |
Do you consider the impact that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
37 |
Do you consider the likelihood |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
38 |
|
Do you consider the human factors |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
39 |
Do you consider the impact that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
40 |
Do you consider the likelihood that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
41 |
Do you consider natural environmental |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
42 |
Do you consider natural events which |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
43 |
|
Do you consider the impact that natural |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
44 |
Do you consider the impact that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
45 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
46 |
Do you consider the likelihood that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
47 |
Do you consider security risk factors and
failures |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
48 |
Do you consider externally supplied |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
49 |
|
Do you consider the impact that externally
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
50 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
51 |
Do you consider externally supplied |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
52 |
|
Do you consider the impact that externally
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
53 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that externally |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
54 |
Do you consider stakeholder |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
55 |
Do you consider stakeholders’ failure |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
56 |
|
Do you consider the impact that stakeholder |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
57 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that
stakeholders |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
58 |
Do you consider how stakeholders’ could damage |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
59 |
Do you consider the impact that stakeholders |
YES |
NO |
||||||
|
60 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood that
stakeholders |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
61 |
Do you consider security equipment risks and failures? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
62 |
Do you consider security equipment design defects? |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
63 |
|
Do you consider the impact that equipment |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
64 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
65 |
Do you consider security equipment |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
66 |
|
Do you consider the impact |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
67 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
68 |
Do you consider security equipment |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
69 |
|
Do you consider the impact |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
70 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
71 |
Do you consider security equipment |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
72 |
|
Do you consider the impact |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
73 |
|
Do you consider the likelihood |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|||
|
74 |
Do you consider information, data management,
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
75 |
Do you consider the impact that information,
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
76 |
Do you consider the likelihood that
information, |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
77 |
Do you consider threats to the continuity |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
78 |
Do you consider the impact that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
79 |
Do you consider the likelihood that |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
|
80 |
Etcetera ... |
YES |
NO |
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
Now that you know what our supply chain
security
Title 81
can be delivered to you on CD or as an email attachment. |
||
|
Praxiom Research Group Limited help@praxiom.com 780-461-4514 |
|||
|
Updated on October 1, 2012. First published on November 30, 2009. |
|||
|
Legal
Restrictions on the Use of this Page
Copyright © 2009 - 2012 by Praxiom Research Group Limited. All Rights Reserved. |
|||
